This patch was already sent, reviewed and applied.
Why do you re-send it?
25/10/2018 12:47, Darek Stojaczyk:
> rte_mp_request_sync() says that the caller is responsible
> for freeing one of its parameters afterwards. vdev didn't
> do that, causing a memory leak.
>
> Fixes: cdb068f031c6 ("bus/vdev: scan by multi-process channel")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Luse <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c b/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c
> index 688e31c21..685cc4e78 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/vdev/vdev.c
> @@ -425,6 +425,7 @@ vdev_scan(void)
> mp_rep = &mp_reply.msgs[0];
> resp = (struct vdev_param *)mp_rep->param;
> VDEV_LOG(INFO, "Received %d vdevs", resp->num);
> + free(mp_reply.msgs);
> } else
> VDEV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to request vdev from primary");
>
>
