On 11/27/18 2:29 PM, David Marchand wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:54 AM Maxime Coquelin
<maxime.coque...@redhat.com <mailto:maxime.coque...@redhat.com>> wrote:
When a guest is spanned on multiple NUMA nodes and
multiple Virtio devices are spanned onto these nodes,
we expect that their ring memory is allocated in the
right memory node.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com
<mailto:maxime.coque...@redhat.com>>
---
drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
index 2ba66d291..d99571d93 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
@@ -335,8 +335,10 @@ virtio_init_queue(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
uint16_t vtpci_queue_idx)
void *sw_ring = NULL;
int queue_type = virtio_get_queue_type(hw, vtpci_queue_idx);
int ret;
+ int numa_node = dev->device->numa_node;
- PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "setting up queue: %u", vtpci_queue_idx);
+ PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "setting up queue: %u on NUMA node %u",
%d ?
Right, thanks for spotting it.
Maxime
