2015-04-29 13:08 GMT+02:00 Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio <sergio.gonzalez.monroy at intel.com>: > On 29/04/2015 11:12, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> It seems this is the second version of your patch. >> Please add v2 prefix and a changelog to ease review and >> patch management. >> As you probably know, it is explained here: >> http://dpdk.org/dev#send > > Hi Thomas, > > Just to clarify as I tend to use RFC PATCH as well, do we still mark it as > v2 even though the first patch was an RFC PATCH?
Yes it's clearer to include RFC PATCH in versioning. RFC is only a keyword to highlight the desire of debating and/or improving with review comments. So I think RFC patch should be considered as the number one. Adding v1 is possible.
