On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:30:51 +0100
Jakub Grajciar <jgraj...@cisco.com> wrote:
> +
> +typedef uint16_t memif_region_index_t;
> +typedef uint32_t memif_region_offset_t;
> +typedef uint64_t memif_region_size_t;
> +typedef uint16_t memif_ring_index_t;
> +typedef uint32_t memif_interface_id_t;
> +typedef uint16_t memif_version_t;
> +typedef uint8_t memif_log2_ring_size_t;
> +
Seems very typedef heavy to me. Having more typedefs
does not improve the readability.
> +typedef struct __attribute__ ((packed)) {
Use __rte_packed rather than attributes directly.
> +typedef struct __attribute__ ((packed)) {
> + uint8_t if_name[32];
> +} memif_msg_connect_t;
> +
Why magic constant 32? Better to use something like
#define MEMIF_NAMESZ 32
Also, I am confused about how this relates
to DPDK device names and Linux network device names (if at all).
