23/01/2019 20:36, Ferruh Yigit: > On 1/23/2019 5:26 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 23/01/2019 18:20, Ananyev, Konstantin: > >> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > >>> 23/01/2019 17:32, Ferruh Yigit: > >>>> On 3/10/2017 8:58 PM, rkerur at gmail.com (Ravi Kerur) wrote: > >>>>> This patchset merges l3fwd-acl and l3fwd code into common directory. > >>>>> Adds config file read option to build LPM and EM tables. > >>>>> > >>>>> Ravi Kerur (3): > >>>>> examples/l3fwd: merge l3fwd-acl code into l3fwd > >>>>> examples/l3fwd: add config file support for lpm > >>>>> examples/l3fwd: add config file support for exact > >>>> > >>>> Hi Ravi, > >>>> > >>>> These l3fwd patches are in patchwork for a long time, I am updating the > >>>> patchset > >>>> as rejected, if it is still relevant please send a new version on top of > >>>> latest > >>>> repo. > >>>> > >>>> Sorry for any inconvenience caused. > >>>> > >>>> For reference patches: > >>>> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/21696/ > >>>> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/21695/ > >>>> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/21697/ > >>>> > >>>> doc one: > >>>> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/24211/ > >>> > >>> This work was going in the right direction. > >>> > >> > >> Totally agree. > >> > >>> Konstantin, as the maintainer of the ACL library, > >>> do you think it is worth to keep this example as standalone or merged? > >> > >> My vote is definitely for merging. > >> That would give us single l3fwd app with 3 different routing methods > >> (lpm, hash, acl) selectable at run-time, plus routing tables in config > >> file. > > > > OK, so we just need to find a volunteer. > > There was a "Nice to have - Future" section in Roadmap webpage [1], does it > help > putting there?
Yes > Also we talked about GSOC recently, can this be an item for it? Yes Good suggestions :)
