> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Conole [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 9:16 PM
> To: Jay Rolette <[email protected]>
> Cc: Mcnamara, John <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Thomas
> Monjalon <[email protected]>; Jerin Jacob
> <[email protected]>; Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>;
> Dumitrescu, Cristian <[email protected]>; Xu, Qian Q
> <[email protected]>; Yongseok Koh <[email protected]>; Maxime Coquelin
> <[email protected]>; Zhang, Qi Z <[email protected]>; Shahaf
> Shuler <[email protected]>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> <[email protected]>; O'Hare, Cathal
> <[email protected]>; Yigit, Ferruh <[email protected]>; Kevin
> Traynor <[email protected]>; Timothy Redaelli <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Release Status Meeting 24/01/2018
>
> Jay Rolette <[email protected]> writes:
>
> >> * Questions from Intel Test about the use of the Stable Tree.
> >> Do people use it? Each stable/LTS release requires a lot of
> >> testing and there are currently 3 releases to be tested.
> >
> > We do @ infinite io.
>
> +1. Red Hat also uses the LTS releases.
Hi,
I should have been clearer on this. I meant the non-LTS "stable" release (the
one we maintain for one release cycle). Historically it was meant for CVEs and
hot-fixes on the head release. The question related to that stable release and
whether people use it.
As suggested on the maintainers call the other day I'll probably put together a
survey to find out.
The utility of the LTS releases isn't in question. :-)
John
