Hi Akhil, Anoob,
> -----Original Message----- > From: Akhil Goyal [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 10:20 AM > To: Anoob Joseph <[email protected]>; Trahe, Fiona <[email protected]>; > Doherty, Declan > <[email protected]>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo > <[email protected]>; Yigit, Ferruh > <[email protected]>; Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]> > Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <[email protected]>; Narayana Prasad Raju > Athreya > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Ankur Dwivedi <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/cryptodev: fix driver name comparison > > > > On 2/28/2019 2:57 PM, Anoob Joseph wrote: > > Hi Akhil, > > > > Please see inline. > > > > Thanks, > > Anoob > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Akhil Goyal <[email protected]> > >> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 2:22 PM > >> To: Anoob Joseph <[email protected]>; Trahe, Fiona > >> <[email protected]>; Doherty, Declan <[email protected]>; De > >> Lara Guarch, Pablo <[email protected]>; Yigit, Ferruh > >> <[email protected]>; Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]> > >> Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <[email protected]>; Narayana Prasad Raju > >> Athreya <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Ankur Dwivedi > >> <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/cryptodev: fix driver name comparison > >> > >> Hi Anoob, > >> > >> On 2/28/2019 12:18 PM, Anoob Joseph wrote: > >>> Hi Akhil, Declan, Pablo, > >>> > >>> Can you review this patch and share your thoughts? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Anoob > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Trahe, Fiona <[email protected]> > >>>> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 5:22 PM > >>>> To: Anoob Joseph <[email protected]>; Akhil Goyal > >>>> <[email protected]>; Doherty, Declan <[email protected]>; > >> De > >>>> Lara Guarch, Pablo <[email protected]>; Yigit, Ferruh > >>>> <[email protected]>; Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]> > >>>> Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <[email protected]>; Narayana Prasad > >>>> Raju Athreya <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Ankur Dwivedi > >>>> <[email protected]> > >>>> Subject: RE: [PATCH] lib/cryptodev: fix driver name comparison > >>>> > >>>> Hi Anoob > >>>> > >>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>> From: Anoob Joseph [mailto:[email protected]] > >>>>> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2019 6:12 AM > >>>>> To: Trahe, Fiona <[email protected]>; Akhil Goyal > >>>>> <[email protected]>; Doherty, Declan <[email protected]>; > >>>>> De Lara Guarch, Pablo <[email protected]>; Yigit, > >>>>> Ferruh <[email protected]>; Thomas Monjalon > >>>>> <[email protected]> > >>>>> Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <[email protected]>; Narayana Prasad > >>>>> Raju Athreya <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Ankur Dwivedi > >>>>> <[email protected]> > >>>>> Subject: RE: [PATCH] lib/cryptodev: fix driver name comparison > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Fiona, > >>>>> > >>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>> From: Trahe, Fiona <[email protected]> > >>>>>> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 9:09 PM > >>>>>> To: Anoob Joseph <[email protected]>; Akhil Goyal > >>>>>> <[email protected]>; Doherty, Declan > >> <[email protected]>; > >>>>>> De Lara Guarch, Pablo <[email protected]> > >>>>>> Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <[email protected]>; Narayana Prasad > >>>>>> Raju Athreya <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Ankur Dwivedi > >>>>>> <[email protected]>; Trahe, Fiona <[email protected]> > >>>>>> Subject: RE: [PATCH] lib/cryptodev: fix driver name comparison > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Anoob, > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> @@ -542,8 +543,8 @@ rte_cryptodev_get_dev_id(const char > >>>> *name) > >>>>>>>>>> return -1; > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.nb_devs; i++) > >>>>>>>>>> - if ((strcmp(cryptodev_globals.devs[i].data->name, > >>>> name) > >>>>>>>>>> - == 0) && > >>>>>>>>>> + if ((strncmp(cryptodev_globals.devs[i].data->name, > >>>>>> name, > >>>>>>>>>> + RTE_CRYPTODEV_NAME_MAX_LEN) > >> consider using "strlen(name) + 1" instead of > >> RTE_CRYPTODEV_NAME_MAX_LEN. > >> This will not cause any ABI breakage in my opinion and and will check till > >> we > >> get a null terminated string in both the strings. > >> What say? > > [Anoob] In that case, I'll restrict the patch to two places. Wherever > > strlen(name) is used, I'll make it > strlen(name)+1. I won't touch strcmp ones as that would work as is. Shall I > prepare a v2? > I think it should be fine. > > Fiona, > Any comments? [Fiona] Good idea. That should be ok. > > -Akhil

