Hi Akhil, Anoob,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akhil Goyal [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 10:20 AM
> To: Anoob Joseph <[email protected]>; Trahe, Fiona <[email protected]>; 
> Doherty, Declan
> <[email protected]>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo 
> <[email protected]>; Yigit, Ferruh
> <[email protected]>; Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <[email protected]>; Narayana Prasad Raju 
> Athreya
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Ankur Dwivedi <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/cryptodev: fix driver name comparison
> 
> 
> 
> On 2/28/2019 2:57 PM, Anoob Joseph wrote:
> > Hi Akhil,
> >
> > Please see inline.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Anoob
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 2:22 PM
> >> To: Anoob Joseph <[email protected]>; Trahe, Fiona
> >> <[email protected]>; Doherty, Declan <[email protected]>; De
> >> Lara Guarch, Pablo <[email protected]>; Yigit, Ferruh
> >> <[email protected]>; Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <[email protected]>; Narayana Prasad Raju
> >> Athreya <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Ankur Dwivedi
> >> <[email protected]>
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/cryptodev: fix driver name comparison
> >>
> >> Hi Anoob,
> >>
> >> On 2/28/2019 12:18 PM, Anoob Joseph wrote:
> >>> Hi Akhil, Declan, Pablo,
> >>>
> >>> Can you review this patch and share your thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Anoob
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Trahe, Fiona <[email protected]>
> >>>> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 5:22 PM
> >>>> To: Anoob Joseph <[email protected]>; Akhil Goyal
> >>>> <[email protected]>; Doherty, Declan <[email protected]>;
> >> De
> >>>> Lara Guarch, Pablo <[email protected]>; Yigit, Ferruh
> >>>> <[email protected]>; Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]>
> >>>> Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <[email protected]>; Narayana Prasad
> >>>> Raju Athreya <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Ankur Dwivedi
> >>>> <[email protected]>
> >>>> Subject: RE: [PATCH] lib/cryptodev: fix driver name comparison
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Anoob
> >>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: Anoob Joseph [mailto:[email protected]]
> >>>>> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2019 6:12 AM
> >>>>> To: Trahe, Fiona <[email protected]>; Akhil Goyal
> >>>>> <[email protected]>; Doherty, Declan <[email protected]>;
> >>>>> De Lara Guarch, Pablo <[email protected]>; Yigit,
> >>>>> Ferruh <[email protected]>; Thomas Monjalon
> >>>>> <[email protected]>
> >>>>> Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <[email protected]>; Narayana Prasad
> >>>>> Raju Athreya <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Ankur Dwivedi
> >>>>> <[email protected]>
> >>>>> Subject: RE: [PATCH] lib/cryptodev: fix driver name comparison
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Fiona,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: Trahe, Fiona <[email protected]>
> >>>>>> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 9:09 PM
> >>>>>> To: Anoob Joseph <[email protected]>; Akhil Goyal
> >>>>>> <[email protected]>; Doherty, Declan
> >> <[email protected]>;
> >>>>>> De Lara Guarch, Pablo <[email protected]>
> >>>>>> Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <[email protected]>; Narayana Prasad
> >>>>>> Raju Athreya <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Ankur Dwivedi
> >>>>>> <[email protected]>; Trahe, Fiona <[email protected]>
> >>>>>> Subject: RE: [PATCH] lib/cryptodev: fix driver name comparison
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Anoob,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> @@ -542,8 +543,8 @@ rte_cryptodev_get_dev_id(const char
> >>>> *name)
> >>>>>>>>>>                    return -1;
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>            for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.nb_devs; i++)
> >>>>>>>>>> -          if ((strcmp(cryptodev_globals.devs[i].data->name,
> >>>> name)
> >>>>>>>>>> -                          == 0) &&
> >>>>>>>>>> +          if ((strncmp(cryptodev_globals.devs[i].data->name,
> >>>>>> name,
> >>>>>>>>>> +                          RTE_CRYPTODEV_NAME_MAX_LEN)
> >> consider using "strlen(name) + 1" instead of
> >> RTE_CRYPTODEV_NAME_MAX_LEN.
> >> This will not cause any ABI breakage in my opinion and and will check till 
> >> we
> >> get a null terminated string in both the strings.
> >> What say?
> > [Anoob] In that  case, I'll restrict the patch to two places. Wherever 
> > strlen(name) is used, I'll make it
> strlen(name)+1. I won't touch strcmp ones as that would work as is. Shall I 
> prepare a v2?
> I think it should be fine.
> 
> Fiona,
> Any comments?
[Fiona] Good idea. That should be ok. 
> 
> -Akhil

Reply via email to