Hi Erik, Apologies if I am reaching out a bit late. Please find my query below
<snipped> > > This enables primary and secondary processes to modify the same timer > > list, which enables some multi-process use cases that were not > > previously possible; e.g. a secondary process can start a timer whose > > expiration is detected in a primary process running a new flavor of > timer_manage(). Does this mean the following, primary can detect the timer expire primed by secondary. On calling new timer_manage() from primary will it invoke call back handler of secondary? If yes, has this been tested with shared library too? <snipped>
