Hi Michael,
Pls review the latest version (v4).
Thanks for your effort
Changchun
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Qiu, Michael
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 6:42 PM
> To: Ouyang, Changchun; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] ixgbe: Support VMDq RSS in non-SRIOV
> environment
>
> On 5/21/2015 3:50 PM, Ouyang Changchun wrote:
> > In non-SRIOV environment, VMDq RSS could be enabled by MRQC register.
> > In theory, the queue number per pool could be 2 or 4, but only 2
> > queues are available due to HW limitation, the same limit also exist in
> > Linux
> ixgbe driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Changchun Ouyang <changchun.ouyang at intel.com>
> > ---
> > lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++
> > lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 82
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > 2 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> > b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c index 024fe8b..6535715 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> > @@ -933,6 +933,16 @@ rte_eth_dev_check_vf_rss_rxq_num(uint8_t
> port_id, uint16_t nb_rx_q)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +#define VMDQ_RSS_RX_QUEUE_NUM_MAX 4
> > +
> > +static int
> > +rte_eth_dev_check_vmdq_rss_rxq_num(__rte_unused uint8_t port_id,
> > +uint16_t nb_rx_q) {
> > + if (nb_rx_q > VMDQ_RSS_RX_QUEUE_NUM_MAX)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int
> > rte_eth_dev_check_mq_mode(uint8_t port_id, uint16_t nb_rx_q,
> uint16_t nb_tx_q,
> > const struct rte_eth_conf *dev_conf) @@ -1093,6
> +1103,36 @@
> > rte_eth_dev_check_mq_mode(uint8_t port_id, uint16_t nb_rx_q,
> uint16_t nb_tx_q,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > }
> > +
> > + if (dev_conf->rxmode.mq_mode ==
> ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_RSS) {
> > + uint32_t nb_queue_pools =
> > + dev_conf-
> >rx_adv_conf.vmdq_rx_conf.nb_queue_pools;
> > + struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info;
> > +
> > + rte_eth_dev_info_get(port_id, &dev_info);
> > + dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.mq_mode =
> ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_RSS;
> > + if (nb_queue_pools == ETH_32_POOLS ||
> nb_queue_pools == ETH_64_POOLS)
> > + RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).nb_q_per_pool =
> > +
> dev_info.max_rx_queues/nb_queue_pools;
> > + else {
> > + PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("ethdev port_id=%d
> VMDQ "
> > + "nb_queue_pools=%d invalid
> "
> > + "in VMDQ RSS\n"
>
> Does here miss "," ?
Yes, it is fixed in later version.
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
>
> > + port_id,
> > + nb_queue_pools);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (rte_eth_dev_check_vmdq_rss_rxq_num(port_id,
> > +
> RTE_ETH_DEV_SRIOV(dev).nb_q_per_pool) != 0) {
> > + PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("ethdev port_id=%d"
> > + " SRIOV active, invalid queue"
> > + " number for VMDQ RSS, allowed"
> > + " value are 1, 2 or 4\n",
> > + port_id);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + }
> > }
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
