On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 16:51:17 +0100
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 08:47:58AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Wed,  3 Apr 2019 15:45:01 +0100
> > Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote:
> >   
> > >  
> > >  static void
> > > -arp_op_name(uint16_t arp_op, char *buf)
> > > +arp_op_name(uint16_t arp_op, char *buf, size_t buf_len)
> > >  {
> > >   switch (arp_op) {
> > >   case ARP_OP_REQUEST:
> > > -         snprintf(buf, sizeof("ARP Request"), "%s", "ARP Request");
> > > +         snprintf(buf, buf_len, "%s", "ARP Request");
> > >           return;  
> > This should be strlcpy not snprintf  
> 
> Yes, it should, but I just let that get fixed by cocci script in the later
> patch. For this one, I just fixed the most egregious error.

Ok, I see 

Reply via email to