On 1/25/2018 3:40 AM, Simon Guo wrote: > > Hi Konstantin, > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 12:14:05PM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: >> Hi Simon, >> >>> >>> Hi, Konstantin, >>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 12:38:35PM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of >>>>> wei.guo.si...@gmail.com >>>>> Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2018 2:35 AM >>>>> To: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo...@intel.com> >>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; Simon Guo >>>>> <wei.guo.si...@gmail.com> >>>>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] app/testpmd: add option ring-bind-lcpu to >>>>> bind Q with CPU >>>>> >>>>> From: Simon Guo <wei.guo.si...@gmail.com> >>>>> >>>>> Currently the rx/tx queue is allocated from the buffer pool on socket of: >>>>> - port's socket if --port-numa-config specified >>>>> - or ring-numa-config setting per port >>>>> >>>>> All the above will "bind" queue to single socket per port configuration. >>>>> But it can actually archieve better performance if one port's queue can >>>>> be spread across multiple NUMA nodes, and the rx/tx queue is allocated >>>>> per lcpu socket. >>>>> >>>>> This patch adds a new option "--ring-bind-lcpu"(no parameter). With >>>>> this, testpmd can utilize the PCI-e bus bandwidth on another NUMA >>>>> nodes. >>>>> >>>>> When --port-numa-config or --ring-numa-config option is specified, this >>>>> --ring-bind-lcpu option will be suppressed. >>>> >>>> Instead of introducing one more option - wouldn't it be better to >>>> allow user manually to define flows and assign them to particular lcores? >>>> Then the user will be able to create any FWD configuration he/she likes. >>>> Something like: >>>> lcore X add flow rxq N,Y txq M,Z >>>> >>>> Which would mean - on lcore X recv packets from port=N, rx_queue=Y, >>>> and send them through port=M,tx_queue=Z. >>> Thanks for the comment. >>> Will it be a too compliated solution for user since it will need to define >>> specifically for each lcore? We might have hundreds of lcores in current >>> modern platforms. >> >> Why for all lcores? >> Only for ones that will do packet forwarding. >> Also if configuration becomes too complex(/big) to be done manually >> user can write a script that will generate set of testpmd commands >> to achieve desired layout. > > It might not be an issue for skillful users, but it will be difficult > for others. --ring-bind-lcpu will help to simply this for them.
Discussion seems not concluded for this patch, and it is sting idle for more than a year. I am marking the patch as rejected, if it is still relevant please send a new version on top of latest repo. Sorry for any inconvenience caused. For reference patch: https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/33771/
