> On Apr 17, 2019, at 1:01 PM, Ori Kam <or...@mellanox.com> wrote:
>
> According to RTE flow the action order should be the order that the
> actions were given.
> In the case of modify actions the position of the action was always
> last.
>
> This commit solves this issue by saving the position of the first modify
> action, and then adds to this position the pointer to the modify action.
>
> Fixes: 4bb14c83df95 ("net/mlx5: support modify header using Direct Verbs")
> Cc: dek...@mellanox.com
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Ori Kam <or...@mellanox.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Yongseok Koh <ys...@mellanox.com>
> v2:
> * Move setting the index position outside the case.
>
> ---
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> index 3862b26..c84779d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> @@ -3235,6 +3235,7 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
> };
> union flow_dv_attr flow_attr = { .attr = 0 };
> struct mlx5_flow_dv_tag_resource tag_resource;
> + uint32_t modify_action_position = UINT32_MAX;
>
> if (priority == MLX5_FLOW_PRIO_RSVD)
> priority = priv->config.flow_prio - 1;
> @@ -3474,13 +3475,16 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
> dev_flow,
> error))
> return -rte_errno;
> - dev_flow->dv.actions[actions_n++] =
> + dev_flow->dv.actions[modify_action_position] =
> dev_flow->dv.modify_hdr->verbs_action;
> }
> break;
> default:
> break;
> }
> + if ((action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_MODIFY_HDR_ACTIONS) &&
> + modify_action_position == UINT32_MAX)
> + modify_action_position = actions_n++;
> }
> dev_flow->dv.actions_n = actions_n;
> flow->actions = action_flags;
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
