On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 07:34:20 -0400 Neil Horman <nhor...@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> > + > > +uint64_t __rte_experimental > > +rte_rand(void) > Do you really want to mark this as experimental? I know it will trigger the > symbol checker with a warning if you don't, but this function already existed > previously and was accepted as part of the ABI. Given that the prototype > hasn't > changed, I think you just need to accept it as a non-experimental function Agree with Neil. Don't mark existing functions as experimental.
