On Thu, 9 May 2019 11:08:30 +0100 "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.bura...@intel.com> wrote:
> >>> If the community agrees that primary/secondary processes should always > >>> use the same DPDK version (regardless of static/dynamic builds etc.), > >>> then this problem would probably be solved. > >> > >> +1 to document that primary/secondary with different DPDK versions > >> is not supported. > >> > > > > +1, > > > > but I think we need to go farther - we need a secondary process to check > > with the primary process. > > We can't assume everyone will read the documentation. > > > > That easily can be done, yes. Agree with the consensus that primary/secondary must be on the same version. Think even driver internal data structures have to be compatiable.
