HI Thomas, Snipped
> > + > > + To built other BPF examples, the compiler requires additional command- > line options. > > "To built" -> "To build" ok > > I think this note is vague. Don't you think it may confuse user if we don't > explicit which kind of options are required? Ok, the `v1` content was `In order to build t2.c and t3.c; pass DPDK targets include and library path as compiler options.`. But as user adds other library functions are added to `examples/bpf' these may vary too. Hence should we state as, `To build other BPF examples, appropriate libraries and dependencies is to be passed as command line options.`
