On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 20:57:36 +0800 Loc Nguyen <locngu...@niometrics.com> wrote:
> Add a device index in front of the PCI ID for easy counting > > Network devices using DPDK-compatible driver > ============================================ > 0: 0000:07:00.0 ... > 1: 0000:07:00.1 ... > > Signed-off-by: Loc Nguyen <locngu...@niometrics.com> > --- > usertools/dpdk-devbind.py | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/usertools/dpdk-devbind.py b/usertools/dpdk-devbind.py > index 9e79f0d28..21da3deca 100755 > --- a/usertools/dpdk-devbind.py > +++ b/usertools/dpdk-devbind.py > @@ -534,7 +534,9 @@ def display_devices(title, dev_list, extra_params=None): > strings.append("%s '%s'" % (dev["Slot"], dev["Device_str"])) > # sort before printing, so that the entries appear in PCI order > strings.sort() > - print("\n".join(strings)) # print one per line > + # add device index in front of each device > + enum_dev_list = ['%2d' % index + ": " + device for index, device in > enumerate(strings)] > + print("\n".join(enum_dev_list)) # print one per line > > def show_device_status(devices_type, device_name): > global dpdk_drivers This is a bad idea. it is making assumption about how ports are ordered which can change if their are other busses, whitelist/blackst or the device may be owned. Longer term, I want DPDK to get away from using and exposing portid's as the preferred API to applications.