On 5/31/2019 8:43 AM, Ye Xiaolong wrote: > Minor nit, this should be a V1 instead of V10 after your RFC.
Normally Xiaolong is right, after RFC the actual patches numbering resets, but for this case I think it is OK as long as people can follow the order, I am OK to continue as v11 for next version, up to you. > > On 05/31, Jakub Grajciar wrote: >> Memory interface (memif), provides high performance >> packet transfer over shared memory. > > It'd be better to have more descrition of this new PMD in the commit log, > something > like you have in memif.rst +1, some more detail in commit log is better. > > Thanks, > Xiaolong >
