> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX <arkadiuszx.kusz...@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 3:55 PM
> To: Shally Verma <shal...@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: akhil.go...@nxp.com; Trahe, Fiona <fiona.tr...@intel.com>;
> shally.ve...@caviumnetworks.com
> Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH] cryptodev: extend api of asymmetric crypto by
> sessionless
>
...
> > > [Shally] Ack to this change. But is this all that is needed to
> > > support sessionless? Do you have working poc with sessionless?
> > >
> >
> > [AK]
> > xform holds to get working. Crypto_op holds sess_type From our side
> > for now we not intend to store any user information in session at all.
> > For sure not private keys, any other information is small enough
> > comparing to asymmetric crypto computation time that it has no gain to
> > allocate session for it.
> >
> [AK] Sorry, I had to fix bad writing.
> rte_crypto_asym_xform holds enough information, and rte_crypto_op holds
> sess_type.
Can you submit example app working on sessionless ?
> >
> > > Thanks
> > > Shally
> > >
> > > >
> > > > __extension__
> > > > union {
> > > > --
> > > > 2.7.4
