On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 5:32 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> wrote:
> On 6/14/2019 8:44 AM, David Marchand wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 9:39 AM Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > wrote: > > > >> 06/04/2019 05:30, Stephen Hemminger: > >>> The symbols in the EXPERIMENTAL were close to alphabetic > >>> order but running sort showed several mistakes. > >>> > >>> This has no impact on code, API, ABI or otherwise. > >>> Purely for humans. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> > >> > >> I don't think it's worth adding a layer of git history for this sort. > >> I would prefer to leave it as is. > >> > >> > > If this is about preferrence, I would prefer we have those symbols sorted > > per versions that introduced them ;-). > > Much easier to check and see if they are candidates for entering stable > ABI. > > > > Not bad idea, +1 from my side J > Here is what it looks like: https://github.com/david-marchand/dpdk/commit/cab0d75ea6bdc7782566d7aad6718b9f5fa784f7 Comments? -- David Marchand
