On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 5:25 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli <
honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com> wrote:
> Free allocated memory.
>
> Fixes: 3f9aab961ed3 ("test/hash: check lock-free extendable bucket")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thak...@arm.com>
> ---
> app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c
> b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c
> index e9aca6ff4..e92d1065b 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c
> @@ -1431,6 +1431,8 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void)
> rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks);
> rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_absent);
> rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path);
> + rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt);
> + rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt);
> rte_free(scanned_bkts);
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.17.1
>
I inspected this test a little more, I can see other leaks.
- generate_keys(), on error, we are leaking tbl_rwc_test_param.h.
- test_rwc_reader(), we are leaking pos.
- test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(), we are leaking
tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path
Looking at your patch 1, I would prefer you reset tbl_rwc_test_param field
per field to NULL once the rte_free() is called.
It would then be easier for you to track the remaining leaks (and patch 1
disappears).
--
David Marchand
