On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 08:54:57PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 6/27/19 8:39 PM, Dekel Peled wrote:
> > Add actions:
> > - INC_TCP_SEQ - Increase sequence number in the outermost TCP header.
> > - DEC_TCP_SEQ - Decrease sequence number in the outermost TCP header.
> > - INC_TCP_ACK - Increase acknowledgment number in the outermost TCP
> > header.
> > - DEC_TCP_ACK - Decrease acknowledgment number in the outermost TCP
> > header.
> >
> > Original work by Xiaoyu Min.
> >
> > This patch introduces a new approach, using a simple integer instead
> > of using an action-specific structure for each of these actions.
> > This approach can be later applied to modify existing actions which
> > require only a single integer.
>
> If we allow it, may be we should fix at least experimental API and
> remove dummy structures.
>
> I think ideally it should be a pre-patch which allows to avoid structures.
> Right now it is a mixture of two logical changes.
Yep, I agree we need to split patches and affected experimental APIs should
be modified as well, although the latter part can be done in a third patch,
possibly a whole separate series since a number of "fix" patches might be
needed. This series has been waiting long enough already.
> > Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dek...@mellanox.com>
>
> A nit below (plus above), other than that
> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybche...@solarflare.com>
Ditto, otherwise looks good to me too, we're almost there!
Dekel: this looks so much cleaner without those pesky structures :)
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > index f3a8fb1..8c962d0 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > @@ -1650,6 +1650,46 @@ enum rte_flow_action_type {
> > * See struct rte_flow_action_set_mac.
> > */
> > RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_MAC_DST,
> > +
> > + /**
> > + * Increase sequence number in the outermost TCP header.
> > + *
> > + * Using this action on non-matching traffic will result in
> > + * undefined behavior.
> > + *
> > + * See struct rte_flow_integer_action.
>
> There is no rte_flow_integer_action, please, fix.
>
> [...]
--
Adrien Mazarguil
6WIND
