03/07/2019 20:31, Chautru, Nicolas:
> Thomas wrote:
> >> Nicolas Chautru (7):
> >>   bbdev: renaming non-generic LTE specific structure
> >>   bbdev: extension of BBDEV API for 5G FEC
> >>   docs/guides: updating bbdev API for 5GNR operations
> >>   baseband/turbo_sw: extension of turbosw PMD for 5G
> >>   docs/guides: updating building steps for BBDEV PMD
> >>   test-bbdev: update of bbdev test-app for 5GNR
> >>   test-bbdev: test vectors for 5GNR verification
> >
> >What are the news about the turbo_sw PMD?
> >We are still not able to compile it.
> >After a very long time of asking for the dependency, what can be the 
> >incentive to get Intel delivering it?
> >Should we block any merge in bbdev until it happens?
> 
> Hi Thomas, 
> What you are referring to was resolved with that previous serie 
> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=5093&state=*
> The turbo_sw_pmd is built by default now and is verified by the DPDK CI. As 
> an option this can be built against the real time signal processing libraries 
> (FlexRAN FEC SDK). The link to latest version of this library is also 
> provided 
> https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/flexran-lte-and-5g-nr-fec-software-development-kit-modules>

Whaouh, it happens and I did not notice it!

> I believe that you reviewed this scheme previously earlier Ferruh of the Tech 
> board as you did provide feedback on the related published article as well as 
> recommended to split the previous serie into several patchsets. 

Indeed, and I did not follow the latest news.

> The last serie under review here in that email thread is the extension of the 
> turbo_sw_pmd driver to support 5GNR operations but still rely on the exact 
> same model and dependency, the only limitation is that these libraries 
> requires AVX512 support for 5GNR operations. 
> 
> Let me know whether there is any discrepancy and want to discuss further 
> through that mailing list, tech board or other method. In case you are trying 
> to compile the SDK and have any issues let us know as well. 

That's fine, I can keep cool, thanks.


Reply via email to