Sorry. Miss the first question. > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2019 18:32 > To: Li, Xiaoyun <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Wu, Jingjing <[email protected]>; Wiles, Keith > <[email protected]>; Liang, Cunming <[email protected]>; Maslekar, > Omkar <[email protected]>; Richardson, Bruce > <[email protected]>; Yigit, Ferruh <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/5] raw/ntb: introduce ntb rawdev driver > > 02/07/2019 08:25, Xiaoyun Li: > > Introduce rawdev driver support for NTB (Non-transparent Bridge) which > > can help to connect two separate hosts with each other. > [...] > > +NTB Rawdev > > Is it Intel property? If yes, I suggest "Intel NTB" as title.
Not just Intel has NTB. AMD, PLX ... also have NTB. The rawdev should be compatible with many kinds of NTB. I implemented specific intel NTB in ntb_hw_intel.c/.h But there is no other ntb in DPDK now. So I am fine to name it as Intel NTB. > > > +M: Xiaoyun Li <[email protected]> > > +M: Jingjing Wu <[email protected]> > > +F: drivers/raw/ntb_rawdev/ > > +F: doc/guides/rawdevs/ntb_rawdev.rst > > Sorry I missed to check the naming here. > Why is it called "ntb_rawdev" and not just "ntb" ? > If you are OK with "ntb" as directory name, I can rename it while applying. >
