No need as API is still experimental. Howver I'd suggest changing the subject to "declare crypto asym xform immutable" non-reusable is confusing as the session and xform will be re-used on all the ops associated with the session.
From: Ayuj Verma [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 3:51 PM To: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc: Trahe, Fiona <[email protected]>; Shally Verma <[email protected]>; Sunila Sahu <[email protected]>; Kanaka Durga Kotamarthy <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [RFC] mark asym session-buffer non-reuseable Hi Akhil, Arek, Fiona, Since this require changes in other Asym PMD( qat) apart from openssl (we plan to send changes for this), so should we need to send any announcement on ABI breakage here before proposing patch v1? Thanks and regards Ayuj Verma ________________________________ From: Ayuj Verma Sent: 18 July 2019 15:17:54 To: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: Trahe, Fiona; Shally Verma; Sunila Sahu; Kanaka Durga Kotamarthy; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [RFC] mark asym session-buffer non-reuseable Hi Arek, Please see inline. Thanks and regards Ayuj Verma ________________________________ From: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: 17 July 2019 19:40 To: Ayuj Verma; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: Trahe, Fiona; Shally Verma; Sunila Sahu; Kanaka Durga Kotamarthy; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [RFC] mark asym session-buffer non-reuseable Hi Ayuj, > -----Original Message----- > From: Ayuj Verma [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 2:34 PM > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Cc: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Trahe, > Fiona > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Ayuj Verma > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: [RFC] mark asym session-buffer non-reuseable > > This RFC proposes changes in asymmetric session usability of transform > structure. In current implementation asym xform is seen as temporary entity > that can be re-used by application once sessions are initialized with it. > > This enforces PMD to copy all key buffers during session setup time. Since > life-time of sessions are small, so we can hold these buffers with session, [AK] - what is you expected session lifetime? (2,3,50 packets?) [Ayuj] In practical scenario like SSL, handshake will happen in some 10-15 packets. > reducing memcpy time by marking these as read-only so that PMDs which > doesn't require any manipulation of xform data can directly use these > buffers in session configure. > > So, sending a proposal to mark xform as non-reusable till lifetime of session. > This will help PMDs to reduce session setup time. > > Ayuj Verma (1): > lib/crypto: mark asym session-buffer non-reuseable > > doc/guides/prog_guide/cryptodev_lib.rst | 6 ++++++ > lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_pmd.h | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > -- > 1.8.3.1
