Hi Thomas,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 6:23 PM
> To: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX <arkadiuszx.kusz...@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Akhil Goyal <akhil.go...@nxp.com>; Shally Verma
> <shal...@marvell.com>; Trahe, Fiona <fiona.tr...@intel.com>; Nowak,
> DamianX <damianx.no...@intel.com>; Ayuj Verma
> <ayve...@marvell.com>; Kanaka Durga Kotamarthy
> <kkotamar...@marvell.com>; Sunila Sahu <ss...@marvell.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v5 0/7] Rework API for RSA algorithm in
> asymmetric crypto
>
> 19/07/2019 14:51, Akhil Goyal:
> > > > Arek Kusztal (7):
> > > > cryptodev: change RSA API comments about primes
> > > > cryptodev: add cipher field to RSA op
> > > > crypto/openssl: add cipher field to openssl RSA implementation
> > > > test: add cipher field to RSA test
> > > > cryptodev: remove RSA PKCS1 BT0 padding
> > > > openssl: remove RSA PKCS1_5 BT0 padding
> > > > test: remove RSA PKCS1_5 BT0 padding from test cases
> > > >
> > > With minor feedback on description on Patchv5 2/7,
> > > Series-acked-by: Shally Verma <shal...@marvell.com>
> >
> > Comment on 2/7 shall be taken in next series for next release as suggested
> by Shally.
> >
> > Applied to dpdk-next-crypto
>
> A commit in cryptodev is removing a field which is removed in PMDs in next
> patches. Guess what? It breaks the compilation in the middle.
> Anyway, there is no reason for this split, so I squash the patches.
[AK] Sorry for that. In future I will squash such commits into one then.
>
>
>
>
