> > 23/07/2019 21:15, Honnappa Nagarahalli: > > Hi Gavin, > > I think this should have been V1 (I mean, no versioning, just 'PATCH'), > since it is converted to patch. I think we should be able to resend it as V1 > and > mark this V3 as 'superseded'. > > > > Hi Thomas, > > Please let us know if it is worth/helps fixing the version. > > I don't follow why it should be v1. This patch series was a RFC (RFC V1 and RFC v2). It is converted to a patch, I thought it should start with V1.
> >
