On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 7:23 PM David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 5:32 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> wrote: >> >> On 6/14/2019 8:44 AM, David Marchand wrote: >> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 9:39 AM Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> 06/04/2019 05:30, Stephen Hemminger: >> >>> The symbols in the EXPERIMENTAL were close to alphabetic >> >>> order but running sort showed several mistakes. >> >>> >> >>> This has no impact on code, API, ABI or otherwise. >> >>> Purely for humans. >> >>> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> >> >> >> >> I don't think it's worth adding a layer of git history for this sort. >> >> I would prefer to leave it as is. >> >> >> >> >> > If this is about preferrence, I would prefer we have those symbols sorted >> > per versions that introduced them ;-). >> > Much easier to check and see if they are candidates for entering stable >> > ABI. >> > >> >> Not bad idea, +1 from my side J > > > Here is what it looks like: > https://github.com/david-marchand/dpdk/commit/cab0d75ea6bdc7782566d7aad6718b9f5fa784f7
Sent the patch rebased on master. https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/57172/ -- David Marchand
