> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Qi Z
> Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2019 7:39 PM
> To: 'Thomas Monjalon' <[email protected]>; Su, Simei
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; Wu, Jingjing <[email protected]>; Xing, Beilei
> <[email protected]>; Yang, Qiming <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce ABI change for rte flow RSS
> action
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2019 7:31 PM
> > To: Su, Simei <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]; Zhang, Qi Z <[email protected]>; Wu, Jingjing
> > <[email protected]>; Xing, Beilei <[email protected]>; Yang,
> > Qiming <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> > [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce ABI change for rte flow
> > RSS action
> >
> > 04/07/2019 06:46, simei:
> > > From: Simei Su <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > Add new structure inputset in rte_flow_action_rss. This can support
> > > input set configuration by rte_flow RSS action.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Simei Su <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > +* ethdev: New member in ``rte_flow_action_rss`` to support input
> > > +set change
> > > + by rte_flow RSS action. It ignores spec and focuses on mask only.
> >
> > There is no comment on this proposal.
> > I think it is missing some explanations about its usage.
> > Would you like to explain an use case and the rte_flow command?
> >
>
> This has been replaced by
> http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/56064/
Sorry, the latest RFC should be http://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/57346/
>
> We don't need it now, I have updated patch status on patchwork.
>
> Thanks
> Qi
>
