On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:32:38 +0530 > Santosh Shukla <sshukla at mvista.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Santosh Shukla <sshukla at mvista.com> >> wrote: >> > virtio_recv_pkts_vec and other virtio vector friend apis are written for >> > sse/avx >> > instructions. For arm64 in particular, virtio vector implementation does >> > not >> > exist(todo). >> > >> > So virtio pmd driver wont build for targets like i686, arm64. By making >> > RTE_VIRTIO_INC_VECTOR=n, Driver can build for non-sse/avx targets and will >> > work >> > in non-vectored virtio mode. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla <sshukla at mvista.com> >> > --- >> >> Ping? >> >> any review / comment on this patch much appreciated. Thanks > > The patches I posted (and were ignored by Intel) to support indirect > and any layout should have much bigger performance gain than all this > low level SSE bit twiddling. >
I little confused - do we care for this patch?
