> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Honnappa Nagarahalli
> Sent: Monday, September 9, 2019 06:50
> To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>;
> konstantin.anan...@intel.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/7] test/rcu: use size_t instead of int
>
> Variables used to store the return value of rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize in
> variables of type 'int'. The variables are of type 'size_t' now.
>
> Fixes: b87089b0bb19 ("test/rcu: add API and functional tests")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin...@arm.com>
> ---
> app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c b/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c
> index cb2d177b7..e0598614c 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_writer_perf(void *arg) static int
> test_rcu_qsbr_perf(void)
> {
> - int sz;
> + size_t sz;
> unsigned int i, tmp_num_cores;
>
> writer_done = 0;
> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_perf(void) static int
> test_rcu_qsbr_rperf(void)
> {
> - int sz;
> + size_t sz;
> unsigned int i, tmp_num_cores;
>
> rte_atomic64_clear(&updates);
> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_rperf(void) static int
> test_rcu_qsbr_wperf(void)
> {
> - int sz;
> + size_t sz;
> unsigned int i;
>
> rte_atomic64_clear(&checks);
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int
> test_rcu_qsbr_sw_sv_1qs(void)
> {
> uint64_t token, begin, cycles;
> - int sz;
> + size_t sz;
> unsigned int i, j, tmp_num_cores;
> int32_t pos;
>
> --
> 2.17.1
The same change is needed by test_rcu_qsbr_sw_sv_1qs_non_blocking.
And there are another 2 occurrences in test_rcu_qsbr.c.
Thanks.
