On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 06:46:32AM +0000, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 12/18/2015 3:03 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > We could first check if we need realloc vq or not, if so,
> > reallocate it. We then do similar to vhost dev realloc.
> >
> > This could get rid of the tons of repeated "if (realloc_dev)"
> > and "if (realloc_vq)" statements, therefore, makes code
> > a bit more readable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/librte_vhost/virtio-net.c | 77 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> >  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio-net.c b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio-net.c
> > index 2f83438..31ca4f7 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio-net.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio-net.c
> > @@ -441,64 +441,59 @@ static struct virtio_net*
> >  numa_realloc(struct virtio_net *dev, int index)
> >  {
> >     int oldnode, newnode;
> > -   struct virtio_net *old_dev, *new_dev = NULL;
> > -   struct vhost_virtqueue *old_vq, *new_vq = NULL;
> > +   struct virtio_net *old_dev;
> > +   struct vhost_virtqueue *old_vq, *vq;
> >     int ret;
> > -   int realloc_dev = 0, realloc_vq = 0;
> >  
> >     old_dev = dev;
> > -   old_vq  = dev->virtqueue[index];
> > +   vq = old_vq = dev->virtqueue[index];
> >  
> > -   ret  = get_mempolicy(&newnode, NULL, 0, old_vq->desc,
> > -                   MPOL_F_NODE | MPOL_F_ADDR);
> > -   ret = ret | get_mempolicy(&oldnode, NULL, 0, old_dev,
> > +   ret = get_mempolicy(&newnode, NULL, 0, old_vq->desc,
> >                     MPOL_F_NODE | MPOL_F_ADDR);
> > +
> > +   /* check if we need to reallocate vq */
> > +   ret = get_mempolicy(&oldnode, NULL, 0, old_vq, MPOL_F_NODE | 
> > MPOL_F_ADDR);
> 
> Why remove the ret = ret | ? Both get_mempolicy could fail.

Right, will fix it.

> 
> >     if (ret) {
> >             RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG,
> > -                   "Unable to get vring desc or dev numa information.\n");
> > +                   "Unable to get vq numa information.\n");
> >             return dev;
> >     }
> > -   if (oldnode != newnode)
> > -           realloc_dev = 1;
> > +   if (oldnode != newnode) {
> > +           RTE_LOG(INFO, VHOST_CONFIG,
> > +                   "reallocate vq from %d to %d node\n", oldnode, newnode);
> > +           vq = rte_malloc_socket(NULL, sizeof(*vq), 0, newnode);
> > +           if (!vq)
> > +                   return dev;
> > +
> > +           memcpy(vq, old_vq, sizeof(*vq));
> > +           rte_free(old_vq);
> > +   }
> >  
> > -   ret = get_mempolicy(&oldnode, NULL, 0, old_vq,
> > -                   MPOL_F_NODE | MPOL_F_ADDR);
> > +   /* check if we need to reallocate dev */
> > +   ret = get_mempolicy(&oldnode, NULL, 0, old_dev, MPOL_F_NODE | 
> > MPOL_F_ADDR);
> >     if (ret) {
> >             RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG,
> > -                   "Unable to get vq numa information.\n");
> > -           return dev;
> > +                   "Unable to get vring desc or dev numa information.\n");
> > +           goto out;
> >     }
> 
> Why vring desc in the err message?

Oops, no idea why I did that. Will fix it.

        --yliu

Reply via email to