> -----Original Message-----
> From: Qiu, Michael
> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 2:55 PM
> To: He, Shaopeng; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/6] fm10k: remove rx queue interrupts
> when dev stops
>
> On 12/21/2015 6:20 PM, Shaopeng He wrote:
> > Previous dev_stop function stops the rx/tx queues. This patch adds
> > logic to disable rx queue interrupt, clean the datapath event and
> queue/vec map.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shaopeng He <shaopeng.he at intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Jing Chen <jing.d.chen at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
> > index a34c5e2..b5b809c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c
> > @@ -1125,6 +1125,8 @@ fm10k_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) static
> > void fm10k_dev_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) {
> > + struct fm10k_hw *hw = FM10K_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data-
> >dev_private);
> > + struct rte_intr_handle *intr_handle = &dev->pci_dev->intr_handle;
> > int i;
> >
> > PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
> > @@ -1136,6 +1138,26 @@ fm10k_dev_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > if (dev->data->rx_queues)
> > for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++)
> > fm10k_dev_rx_queue_stop(dev, i);
> > +
> > + /* Disable datapath event */
> > + if (rte_intr_dp_is_en(intr_handle)) {
> > + for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) {
> > + FM10K_WRITE_REG(hw, FM10K_RXINT(i),
> > + 3 << FM10K_RXINT_TIMER_SHIFT);
> > + if (hw->mac.type == fm10k_mac_pf)
> > + FM10K_WRITE_REG(hw,
> FM10K_ITR(Q2V(dev, i)),
> > + FM10K_ITR_MASK_SET);
> > + else
> > + FM10K_WRITE_REG(hw,
> FM10K_VFITR(Q2V(dev, i)),
> > + FM10K_ITR_MASK_SET);
> > + }
> > + }
> > + /* Clean datapath event and queue/vec mapping */
> > + rte_intr_efd_disable(intr_handle);
> > + if (intr_handle->intr_vec != NULL) {
>
> This line could be removed, because rte_free already do the check, see
> below:
> void rte_free(void *addr)
> {
> if (addr == NULL) return;
> if (malloc_elem_free(malloc_elem_from_data(addr)) < 0)
> rte_panic("Fatal error: Invalid memory\n"); }
Yes, it could be removed. Thanks.
>
> > + rte_free(intr_handle->intr_vec);
> > + intr_handle->intr_vec = NULL;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > static void
