>From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 4:23 AM
>
>On 10/29/2019 11:09 AM, Gavin Hu wrote:
>> The definition is conflicting with that of the compiler, as show the
>> following error: ../drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_osal.h:27:17: error:
>> conflicting types for ‘uint64_t’ #define __le64 uint64_t ^~~~ In file
>> included from /usr/include/stdint.h:37, from
>> /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/8/include/stdint.h:9, from
>> ../lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/arm/rte_byteorder.h:16, from
>> ../drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x.h:17, from ../drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_rxtx.c:8:
>> /usr/include/aarch64-linux-gnu/bits/stdint-uintn.h:27:20: note:
>> previous declaration of ‘uint64_t’ was here typedef __uint64_t
>> uint64_t;
>>
>> The fix is to remove the duplicate definition.
>>
>> Fixes: 38dff79ba736 ("net/bnx2x: update HSI")
>> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Hu <gavin...@arm.com>
>
>Hi Rasesh, Shahed,
>
>The driver is causing the build error for the arm, I remember same issue was
>valid for x86 and fixed later but seems not fixed for arm.
>
>Can you please check for the build error, if we can't find a solution, may have
>to merge this patch.
>
Hi Ferruh,
We have a solution to fix the bnx2x build error, it's part of the bug 355. I
plan to send it out once tested on failing setup.
Thanks!
-Rasesh
>Thanks,
>ferruh
>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_osal.h | 4 ----
>> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_osal.h
>> b/drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_osal.h index 7cd2932..aad4e0b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_osal.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_osal.h
>> @@ -22,8 +22,4 @@
>> #undef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
>> #endif
>>
>> -#define __le16 uint16_t
>> -#define __le32 uint32_t
>> -#define __le64 uint64_t
>> -
>> #endif /* BNX2X_OSAL_H */
>>
