On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 10:52 PM Ori Kam <or...@mellanox.com> wrote:
>
> This patch is not correct,
> You are using old code. This was already solved.
Thanks for your review, and tips
> Thanks,
> Ori
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xiangxia.m....@gmail.com <xiangxia.m....@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 4:19 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m....@gmail.com>; Ori Kam
> > <or...@mellanox.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH dpdk-dev 3/3] net/mlx5: remove the assert for rxq cq
> >
> > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m....@gmail.com>
> >
> > The mlx5_rxq_obj_hairpin_new doesn't alloc the
> > cq anymore. When releasing it, don't check it.
> >
> > Fixes: e79c9be91515 ("net/mlx5: support Rx hairpin queues")
> > Cc: Ori Kam <or...@mellanox.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m....@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c
> > index 2a12d5fa3436..582a2330e575 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c
> > @@ -673,7 +673,6 @@ mlx5_rxq_obj_release(struct mlx5_rxq_obj
> > *rxq_obj)
> >       assert(rxq_obj);
> >       if (rxq_obj->type == MLX5_RXQ_OBJ_TYPE_IBV)
> >               assert(rxq_obj->wq);
> > -     assert(rxq_obj->cq);
> >       if (rte_atomic32_dec_and_test(&rxq_obj->refcnt)) {
> >               switch (rxq_obj->type) {
> >               case MLX5_RXQ_OBJ_TYPE_IBV:
> > --
> > 2.23.0
>
>
>

Reply via email to