On 12/03, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 08:33:22PM +0800, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
>> On 12/03, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>> >On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 01:29:17PM +0800, Xiaolong Ye wrote:
>> >> kernel_dir option in meson build is equivalent to RTE_KERNELDIR in make
>> >> system, for cross-compilation case, users would specify it as local
>> >> kernel src dir like
>> >>
>> >> /<user local dir>/target-arm_glibc/linux-arm/linux-4.19.81/
>> >>
>> >> Current meson build would fail to compile kernel module if user specify
>> >> kernel_dir as above, this patch fixes this issue.
>> >>
>> >> Fixes: 317832f97c16 ("kernel/linux: fix modules install path")
>> >> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>> >> Cc: iryz...@nfware.com
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong...@intel.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>
>> >> V2 changes:
>> >>
>> >> 1. handle both normal and cross-compilation cases
>> >>
>> >We need to handle both, but they need to be handled without breaking the
>> >currently working case where we pass in /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/ as the
>> >kerneldir path.
>>
>> So you mean we should allow user to specify both /lib/modules/$(uname -r) and
>> /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build as kernel_dir for normal case?
>>
>That is up to you, but we need to still allow the former case so as to
>avoid breaking backward compatibility for existing build setups. Therefore
>I suggest supporting both is recommended.
Make sense, I'll try a new version.
Thanks,
Xiaolong
>
>/Bruce
