> -----Original Message----- > From: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 10:27 AM > To: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>; Dumitrescu, Cristian > <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>; Singh, Jasvinder > <jasvinder.si...@intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] maintainers: set git tree for packet framework and QoS > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:23 AM Thomas Monjalon > <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote: > > > > 14/01/2020 11:05, David Marchand: > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > > @@ -1256,6 +1256,7 @@ F: > doc/guides/sample_app_ug/packet_ordering.rst > > > Hierarchical scheduler > > > M: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com> > > > M: Jasvinder Singh <jasvinder.si...@intel.com> > > > +T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-qos > > > F: lib/librte_sched/ > > > F: doc/guides/prog_guide/qos_framework.rst > > > F: app/test/test_red.c > > > > librte_meter is also candidate to QoS tree. > > Argh, thought I had double checked... ok will fix. >
Yes, librte_meter should also go to the QoS tree. > > > About ethdev TM and MTR, I am not sure what is the right thing to do. > > The drivers using those apis are in dpdk-next-net. > Yes, these APIs are ethdev API, although QoS related. > > -- > David Marchand
