Thanks Prateek for the comments. Agree with both the corrections. Would you like to submit a patch?
Thanks, Honnappa > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2020 3:36 PM > To: prateekag <pratee...@cse.iitb.ac.in> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-web] DPDK Programmer's Guide :ERRATA > > Thanks for the comments. > I did not look at this doc but I'm sure Honnappa will have answers. > > Note: you may want to update the doc yourself by making a patch for the > DPDK git. > > Rerouting this email to dpdk-dev and adding Honnappa. > > 26/01/2020 19:46, prateekag: > > Dear, > > > > I am currently going through the DPDK programmer's guide 20.02-rc1 > > updated on January 21, 2020, as a part of my Master's Project. > > I found the following errors in the documentation. > > a) In section 5.1 (What is quiescent state): In paragraph 5, The > > line "So reader thread 1 will not have a reference to the deleted > > entry" should be replaced with "So reader thread 3 will not have a > > reference to the deleted entry." We are talking about reader thread 3 > > and its behavior in this paragraph and not reader thread 1." > > b) If what I am thinking is right, this one is a much serious error. > > In section 6.5.3 Multiple Producers enqueue Figure 6.10, the global > > prod_head(ring-> prod_head) should point one place to the right of the > > obj5 (i.e. shift it from its current position to one place right) As > > in third step, core 2 CAS is successful as mention in the text. > > If I am not mailing to the correct mailing list, kindly forward the > > message to the correct mailing list. > > > > Regards > > Prateek Agarwal > >
