Hi Maxime,
Sorry for the late reply.
This patch is incorrect. I have sent the correct version
http://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/65302/
Regards,
Fan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 9:30 AM
> To: Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zh...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] example/vhost_crypto: fix incorrect fetch size
>
> Hi Fan,
>
> On 11/26/19 10:54 AM, Fan Zhang wrote:
> > Coverity issue: 343401
> >
> > Fixes: f5188211c721 ("examples/vhost_crypto: add sample application")
> > Cc: roy.fan.zh...@intel.com
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zh...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > examples/vhost_crypto/main.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/examples/vhost_crypto/main.c
> > b/examples/vhost_crypto/main.c index 1d7ba9419..5d80bcaca 100644
> > --- a/examples/vhost_crypto/main.c
> > +++ b/examples/vhost_crypto/main.c
> > @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ vhost_crypto_worker(void *arg)
> > continue;
> >
> > for (j = 0; j < NB_VIRTIO_QUEUES; j++) {
> > - to_fetch = RTE_MIN(burst_size,
> > + to_fetch = RTE_MAX(burst_size,
> > (NB_CRYPTO_DESCRIPTORS
> -
> > info->nb_inflight_ops));
> > fetched = rte_vhost_crypto_fetch_requests(
> >
>
> Could you please add a commit message to explain the change?
> With just the patch context, this fix looks weird.
>
> Thanks!
> Maxime
