[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] app/testpmd:test NVGRE Tx checksum offload

[Liu, Jijiang]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 5:53 PM
> To: Liu, Jijiang; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] app/testpmd:test NVGRE Tx checksum
> offload
> 
> Hi Jijiang,
> 
> 
> On 02/12/2015 01:45 AM, Jijiang Liu wrote:
> > Enhance csum fwd engine based on current TX checksum framework in order
> to test TX Checksum offload for NVGRE packet.
> >
> > It includes:
> >  - IPv4 and IPv6 packet
> >  - outer L3, inner L3 and L4 checksum offload for Tx side.
> >
> > [...]
> > @@ -231,20 +235,25 @@ parse_gre(struct simple_gre_hdr *gre_hdr, struct
> testpmd_offload_info *info)
> >     struct ether_hdr *eth_hdr;
> >     struct ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr;
> >     struct ipv6_hdr *ipv6_hdr;
> > +   uint8_t gre_len = 0;
> >
> > -   /* if flags != 0; it's not supported */
> > -   if (gre_hdr->flags != 0)
> > +   /* check which fields are supported */
> > +   if (gre_hdr->flags != 0 &&
> > +           (gre_hdr->flags & _htons(GRE_SUPPORTED_FIELDS)) == 0)
> >             return;
> >
> > +   gre_len += sizeof(struct simple_gre_hdr);
> > +
> > +   if (gre_hdr->flags & _htons(GRE_KEY_PRESENT))
> > +           gre_len += GRE_KEY_LEN;
> > +
> 
> I think this test won't work if the flags contains both supported and 
> unsupported
> flags.
> 
> What about this instead:
> 
> if ((gre_hdr->flags & _htons(~GRE_SUPPORTED_FIELDS)) != 0)
>       return;
> 
That's correct, I will update it in next version.

> 
> Regards,
> Olivier