David Marchand <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 6:53 PM Aaron Conole <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Bruce Richardson <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > Static builds can take a lot of space, so reduce the number of examples >> > built when doing those static builds. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <[email protected]> >> > --- >> >> It looks good to me. I'll try a run with Ruifeng's no-huge series and >> see if I can trigger errors on my side (and then see what happens with >> the cache sizes, too). Might take some time as I adjust some things >> here. > > - The disk quota issue was reproduced on master without Ruifeng patches: > https://travis-ci.com/github/DPDK/dpdk/jobs/298584616 > https://travis-ci.com/github/DPDK/dpdk/jobs/298858638
Okay - guess I should just ack those patches, then. They look good otherwise. > > And for this, the cache is not really big. > cache-arm64-linux-bionic-a550182015679db90d1e0a2460464d106712e1c2c29f3efc7db1dc1b6fd86ebb--compiler-gcc.tgz > last modified: 2020-03-16 11:28:59 size: 160.84 MiB > I remember bigger caches in the past. > > I deleted this job cache and restarted the first job, and it passed. > Restarted again, and then it failed o_O. > > > - So I went and restarted a couple of times both of those jobs > (leaving the cache as is, which now contains 60MB of data). > I get random failures. > It does not seem to depend on the system: it failed once on > [email protected], then > worked later. Seems it's all arm64 builds that are failing. I went to file an issue, but looks like you beat me to it :) https://travis-ci.community/t/disk-quota-exceeded-on-arm64/7619 I'll help promote the issue however I can > hostname: [email protected]: KO > hostname: [email protected]: ok > hostname: [email protected]: ok > hostname: [email protected]: ok > hostname: [email protected]: ok > > hostname: [email protected]: KO > hostname: [email protected]: ok > hostname: [email protected]: ok > hostname: [email protected]: KO > hostname: [email protected]: ok
