On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 5:05 PM Gavin Hu <gavin...@arm.com> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com> > > Hi Gavin, I lost track if v2 is still a candidate for merge. fwiw, it > > compiles without giving the zero-length-bounds warning on my system. > > > > Kevin. > > Yes, this path alone is a candidate for merge.
This patch is not mergeable, it would trigger failures in the ABI checks. You can see in patchwork that the robot reported a warning in Travis. http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-March/119919.html https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/295652710#L4476 I opened a bz to libabigail. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25661 Either a different solution is found, or your patch will have to deal with this issue (libabigail fix won't be ready soon afaik) and waive this. -- David Marchand
