One more thing:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Pablo de Lara
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 April, 2020 12:23
> To: Doherty, Declan <declan.dohe...@intel.com>; akhil.go...@nxp.com;
> Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zh...@intel.com>; tho...@monjalon.net
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] test/crypto: add capability check
>
> Check if test case is supported by the crypto device, including algorithm and
> some of its parameter, such as key length, IV length, etc, using the
> capabilities API.
> If it is not supported, test case is skipped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>
> ---
> app/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c | 49
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c
> b/app/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c
> index 2ff7fc9..b0e53ee 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,47 @@
> #include "test_cryptodev_hash_test_vectors.h"
>
> static int
> +verify_algo_support(const struct blockcipher_test_case *t,
> + const uint8_t dev_id, const uint32_t digest_len) {
> + int ret;
> + const struct blockcipher_test_data *tdata = t->test_data;
> + struct rte_cryptodev_sym_capability_idx cap_idx;
> + const struct rte_cryptodev_symmetric_capability *capability;
> +
> + if (t->op_mask & BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_OP_CIPHER) {
> + cap_idx.type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER;
> + cap_idx.algo.cipher = tdata->crypto_algo;
> + capability = rte_cryptodev_sym_capability_get(dev_id,
> &cap_idx);
> + if (capability == NULL)
> + return -1;
> +
> + ret = rte_cryptodev_sym_capability_check_cipher(capability,
> + tdata-
> >cipher_key.len,
> + tdata->iv.len);
> + if (ret != 0)
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + if (t->op_mask & BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_OP_AUTH) {
> + cap_idx.type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AUTH;
> + cap_idx.algo.auth = tdata->auth_algo;
> + capability = rte_cryptodev_sym_capability_get(dev_id,
> &cap_idx);
> + if (capability == NULL)
> + return -1;
> +
> + ret = rte_cryptodev_sym_capability_check_auth(capability,
> + tdata->auth_key.len,
> + digest_len,
> + 0);
> + if (ret != 0)
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> test_blockcipher_one_case(const struct blockcipher_test_case *t,
> struct rte_mempool *mbuf_pool,
> struct rte_mempool *op_mpool,
> @@ -112,6 +153,14 @@ test_blockcipher_one_case(const struct
> blockcipher_test_case *t,
> nb_segs = 3;
> }
>
> + /* Check if PMD is capable of performing that test */
> + if (verify_algo_support(t, dev_id, digest_len) < 0) {
> + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, USER1,
> + "Device is not capable of performing this algorithm."
> + "Test Skipped.\n");
Pablo, please explain why did you use RTE_LOG here? All strings in this source
code file are shown using printf. This is the only place with RTE_LOG call now.
Adam
