> -----Original Message-----
> From: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 10:25 AM
> To: Doherty, Declan <[email protected]>; [email protected]; 
> [email protected];
> [email protected]; Zhang, Roy Fan <[email protected]>; Trahe, Fiona
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; De Lara Guarch, Pablo 
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] Crypto test refactoring (second phase)
> 
> This patchset is the phase two of the crypto test refactoring
> effort. It mainly focuses on removing the PMD bitmask used
> to select which PMDs are used to run the tests against.
> Instead, now all PMDs will run all test cases and the capability
> checking will determine which ones are supported and therefore,
> are not skipped.
> 
> Since there are tests cases that require sessionless support,
> a new feature flag has been added, which reflects this support per PMD.
> 
> I am CC'ing all PMD maintainers, asking for their collaboration to
> test this patchset, as this might impact the testing of each PMD.
> 
> 
> This patchset depends on:
> (1) http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/68433/ (crypto/openssl: fix out-of-place 
> encryption)
> (2) http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/68434/ (cryptodev: add missing feature name)
> (3) http://patches.dpdk.org/cover/68677/ (Crypto test refactoring (first 
> phase))
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Added new commit, adding a check for out-of-place operations
> 
> Pablo de Lara (4):
>   cryptodev: add sessionless support feature flag
>   test/crypto: check if device supports sessionless
>   test/crypto: check if device supports out-of-place ops
>   test/crypto: do not check for PMD in tests

Series Acked-by: Fiona Trahe <[email protected]>

Reply via email to