Honnappa Nagarahalli <[email protected]> writes: > <snip> > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ci: remove aarch64 from Travis jobs >> >> 16/04/2020 15:45, Aaron Conole: >> > David Marchand <[email protected]> writes: >> > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 2:44 PM Aaron Conole <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]> writes: >> > >> >> > >> > Travis is not reliable for native Arm and PPC: >> > >> > https://travis-ci.community/t/disk-quota-exceeded-on-arm64/7619/6 > Thanks David for creating the ticket. Will escalate this through our > contacts at Travis CI, hopefully it can be resolved soon.
I did get an email from someone at travis support acknowledging the issue and saying that they are working on it. >> > >> > >> > >> > In order to get reliable Travis reports, the use of Arm machines >> > >> > is removed until Travis fixes it. >> > >> > >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]> >> > >> > --- >> > >> >> > >> We should add back the cross-build if we do this - at least then we >> > >> could have a reliable compilation test of Arm64 code. Does it make >> > >> sense? >> > > >> > > I don't see them removed by this patch, the two jobs are still present ? >> > >> > Whoops - for some reason I missed them. Nevermind :) >> >> So? Acked? >> >> >>
