On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:20:33 +0200 Panu Matilainen <pmatilai at redhat.com> wrote:
> The tool is technically correct, even if loss of precision might be > unlikely to occur in this context Overflow is not there in the code. That is why I said "shooting Unicorns"; this is all about about fixing bugs that don't exist because there is nothing there in the real world. In this code buffer is always something normal in size and does not exceed 2^32-1.
