> -----Original Message----- > From: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciec...@partner.samsung.com> > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 7:43 PM > To: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>; Van Haaren, Harry > <harry.van.haa...@intel.com> > Cc: Jerin Jacob <jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com>; dev <dev@dpdk.org>; dpdk > stable <sta...@dpdk.org> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal: fix lcore state bug > > > W dniu 18.05.2020 o 20:39, David Marchand pisze: > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 8:25 PM Lukasz Wojciechowski > > <l.wojciec...@partner.samsung.com> wrote: > >> Hi David, > >> > >> The patch is here for quite a while and I believe it's assign to you. > >> Today there were some questions about it on > >> https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=a0a7498c-fd694ac1-a0a6c2c3- > 000babff24ad- > 7a5364411def2fdf&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fbugs.dpdk.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3F > id%3D464 > >> > >> Is there anything else to be done, so it can be accepted? > > I want a clear ACK from a maintainer. > > Here Harry, since this is services specific code. > > The current discussion seems unfinished to me, maybe Harry can conclude? > > > > Besides, I am reluctant to take EAL changes in rc3 (out of compilation > > fixes or fixes for problems introduced in the current release). > > Thanks for the answer. > > Let's wait for Harry's opinion and come back to the topic after current > release. > > Sorry for the rush.
Hi Lukasz, Also reluctant to make changes in RC3, so let's fix early in the 20.08 timeframe. Will schedule some time to dig into the detail here and provide detailed input. Regards, -Harry
