On 30/06/2020 11:02, Ali Alnubani wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kevin Traynor <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2020 12:53 PM
>> To: Ali Alnubani <[email protected]>; [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]; Abhishek Marathe <[email protected]>;
>> Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>; [email protected]; David
>> Christensen <[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal
>> <[email protected]>; Ian Stokes <[email protected]>; Jerin
>> Jacob <[email protected]>; John McNamara <[email protected]>;
>> Ju-Hyoung Lee <[email protected]>; Luca Boccassi <[email protected]>;
>> Pei Zhang <[email protected]>; [email protected];
>> [email protected]; Raslan Darawsheh <[email protected]>; Thomas
>> Monjalon <[email protected]>; [email protected];
>> [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: 18.11.9 (LTS) patches review and test
>>
>> On 30/06/2020 09:54, Ali Alnubani wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>
>> Hi Ali,
>>
>> Thanks for testing.
>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Kevin Traynor <[email protected]>
>>>> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 3:53 PM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Cc: [email protected]; Abhishek Marathe
>> <[email protected]>;
>>>> Akhil Goyal <[email protected]>; Ali Alnubani
>>>> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; David Christensen
>>>> <[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal
>> <[email protected]>;
>>>> Ian Stokes <[email protected]>; Jerin Jacob <[email protected]>;
>>>> John McNamara <[email protected]>; Ju-Hyoung Lee
>>>> <[email protected]>; Kevin Traynor <[email protected]>; Luca
>>>> Boccassi <[email protected]>; Pei Zhang <[email protected]>;
>>>> [email protected]; [email protected]; Raslan Darawsheh
>>>> <[email protected]>; Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]>;
>>>> [email protected]; [email protected]
>>>> Subject: 18.11.9 (LTS) patches review and test
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Here is a list of patches targeted for LTS release 18.11.9.
>>>>
>>>> The planned date for the final release is 3rd July.
>>>>
>>>> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report
>>>> any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release
>>>> the fixes and reported validations will be added to the release notes.
>>>>
>>>
>>> We ran the following tests on Mellanox hardware for this version:
>>> - Basic functionality:
>>>   Send and receive multiple types of traffic.
>>> - testpmd xstats counter tests.
>>> - testpmd timestamp tests.
>>> - Changing/checking link status through testpmd.
>>> - RTE flow and flow_director tests:
>>>   Items: eth / vlan / ipv4 / ipv6 / tcp / udp / gre
>>>   Actions: drop / queue / rss / mark / flag
>>> - Some RSS tests.
>>> - VLAN stripping and insertion tests.
>>> - Checksum and TSO tests.
>>> - ptype tests.
>>> - l3fwd-power example application tests.
>>> - Multi-process example applications tests.
>>>
>>> Testing matrix:
>>> - NIC: ConnectX-4 Lx / OS: RHEL7.4 / Driver:
>>> MLNX_OFED_LINUX-5.0-2.1.8.0 / Firmware: 14.27.1016
>>> - NIC: ConnectX-5 / OS: RHEL7.4 / Driver: MLNX_OFED_LINUX-5.0-2.1.8.0
>>> / Firmware: 16.27.2008
>>>
>>> We found 2 issues:
>>> - Failure to restart ports with kernels newer than 5.6 (call to mmap failed 
>>> on
>> UAR for txq).
>>> - Applications fail to start with CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_MLX5_DEBUG enabled
>> (mlx5_ifindex: Assertion `priv->if_index' failed).
>>

To wrap this thread, the following series were applied for the above
issues and Ali re-ran validation.

http://inbox.dpdk.org/stable/[email protected]/

http://inbox.dpdk.org/stable/[email protected]/


>> Are these regressions? i.e. does 18.11.8 fail in the same way in the same
>> testbed
> 
> The first issue reproduces in previous releases as well, but only with 
> kernels newer than 5.6.
> The second one seems to have started reproducing in v18.11.7, but I only 
> noticed it while testing this release.
> 
>>
>>> We are discussing these issues internally, and we see no other regressions
>> blocking the release.
>>>
>>
>> ok, please let me know the outcome and if any patches need to be
>> added/removed to resolve these issues.
> 
> Will do.
> 
>>
>> thanks,
>> Kevin.
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ali
>>>
> 
> Thanks,
> Ali
> 

Reply via email to