W dniu 15.07.2020 o 15:02, David Marchand pisze: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:56 PM Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com> wrote: >> I guess the service_lcore_attr_get failed, but with no useful Why do you suspect service_lcore_attr_get() ? >> information. We should have the test suite app turn the log level all >> the way up. I realize it will increase the log data even higher, but >> without it, we have no idea why this test failed. >> >> Something like the following >> --- >> >> diff --git a/app/test/test.c b/app/test/test.c >> index 94d26ab1f6..c47cb075f9 100644 >> --- a/app/test/test.c >> +++ b/app/test/test.c >> @@ -150,6 +150,9 @@ main(int argc, char **argv) >> >> prgname = argv[0]; >> >> + rte_log_set_global_level(RTE_LOG_DEBUG); >> + rte_log_set_level(RTE_LOGTYPE_EAL, RTE_LOG_DEBUG); >> + >> recursive_call = getenv(RECURSIVE_ENV_VAR); >> if (recursive_call != NULL) { >> ret = do_recursive_call(); >> --- >> >> That way we can at least debug when it happens. > Debugging is one thing. > But here service_lcore_attr_get() has a lot of asserts that should > trigger a straight error. > Yes, but without debugs enabled, the assert message won't be printed out.
-- Lukasz Wojciechowski Principal Software Engineer Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics Office +48 22 377 88 25 l.wojciec...@partner.samsung.com