On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 10:41:33PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:20:37 -0700 > Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The existing definition of rte_epoll_wait retries if interrupted > > by a signal. This behavior makes it hard to use rte_epoll_wait > > for applications that want to use signals do do things like > > exit polling loop and shutdown. > > > > Since changing existing semantic might break applications, add > > a new rte_epoll_wait_interruptible() function that does the > > same thing as rte_epoll_wait but will return -1 and errno of EINTR > > if it receives a signal. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Harman Kalra <[email protected]> Hi Stephen, I have reviewed and tested the patch, looks good to me. Can you please rebase the patch to latest tree. Thanks Harman > > This patch has been sitting unreviewed, uncommented, and unmerged for > two releases. It seems only patches from HW vendors get the attention.
