> -----Original Message----- > From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerinjac...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 3:45 PM > To: Rasesh Mody <rm...@marvell.com> > Cc: wangyunjian <wangyunj...@huawei.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Shahed Shaikh > <shsha...@marvell.com>; Lilijun (Jerry) <jerry.lili...@huawei.com>; xudingke > <xudin...@huawei.com>; sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [EXT] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/qede: remove dead code > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:14 AM Rasesh Mody <rm...@marvell.com> wrote: > > > > >From: wangyunjian <wangyunj...@huawei.com> > > >Sent: Friday, July 17, 2020 4:16 AM > > > > > >From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunj...@huawei.com> > > > > > >This patch fixes (Logically dead code) coverity issue. > > > > > >Coverity issue: 261777, 261778 > > >Fixes: dd28bc8c6ef4 ("net/qede: fix VF port creation sequence") > > >Cc: sta...@dpdk.org > > > > > >Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunj...@huawei.com> > > >--- > > > > Acked-by: Rasesh Mody <rm...@marvell.com> > > There is build issue reported with this patch by CI for qede. Please check it > is > valid or not http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-July/145267.html
I've already checked. I don't know the reason why the codes on both sides are different. The origin code: fprintf(stderr,"Can not write all of dump data bytes=%zd len=%zd\n", The CI code: fprintf(stderr, "Can not write all of dump data bytes=%ld len=%ld\n", > > > > > Thanks! > >
